<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 7 most useful social media tools for PR (Plus: what reporters want)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hotelmarketingstrategies.com/social-media-for-pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hotelmarketingstrategies.com/social-media-for-pr/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Ideas for Your Hotel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:48:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.hotelmarketingstrategies.com/social-media-for-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotelmarketingstrategies.com/?p=2711#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Thank you! I always wondered if I was the only one who wondered why all these &quot;new appointments&quot; were published in the media (do they do that themselves, for their ego??). I was just commenting to some staff that I was disappointed in the poor coverage of the Christmas party we organised for 9 orphanages 170 orphans (everyone cares), and yet there was more coverage on the newly appointed M&amp;S Dir (with a &quot;retouched&quot; pic of the fellow!) (no-one cares)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! I always wondered if I was the only one who wondered why all these &#8220;new appointments&#8221; were published in the media (do they do that themselves, for their ego??). I was just commenting to some staff that I was disappointed in the poor coverage of the Christmas party we organised for 9 orphanages 170 orphans (everyone cares), and yet there was more coverage on the newly appointed M&amp;S Dir (with a &#8220;retouched&#8221; pic of the fellow!) (no-one cares)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

